The past week I’ve been reading the
book The Problems of Philosophy by
Bertrand Russell and also conducted an analytic review on an interesting article
about mobile payment from a Journal found in the database “Web of science”.
And that was one of the first useful
things I’ve learnt in this curse; how to access these great databases and
access high quality journals.
Another thing I’ve learnt, since I’m
referring to “high quality” is the concept of Impact factor which I hadn’t
heard before.
I’ve also grasped how to perform
research article critique.
However, reading the book by
Bertrand Russell is what has got me thinking and wondering this week.
The second seminar gave me a lot of
different approaches on Russell’s text and it helped me clarify some arguments
and it was interesting discussing Russell’s reasoning.
Anyhow, I think it’s hard to “get
the message” with Russell’s book, it sure got me thinking a lot but he’s arguments
can often be taken another step and this often creates a circular
argumentation, much like the kind Leif explained when talking about that there
is no true answer to what knowledge is. But I think I can kind of conclude one
thing from it which would be that one should always think critical about the
sources that “supplies” us with information and weed out what can be
categorized as facts and turned into useful knowledge according to your own
criteria. And I think those criteria’s has been updated a bit this week..
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar